Response to Martha

Response to Martha
Risk-Benefit Ratio

The Doctor of Nursing practice, sometimes known as a DNP, integrates research findings
into clinical practice to enhance patient outcomes. It is essential to analyze the results
thoroughly, otherwise, the reliability of the evidence may be compromised. An examination that
aims to quantify the risks and advantages and, as a result, their ratio is called a risk-benefit
analysis.
Ethical considerations should be taken into account since they have a bearing not only on
the evidence's effect on patients but also on the way the evidence is assessed. Clinical research
requires participants to have direct contact with human beings or materials derived from humans.
Consent from patients made with their best interests in mind is necessary before anything like
this can proceed (Seville et al., 2019). In the event that this does not take place, it is seen as
unethical. During the process of putting the DNP project into action, the risk-benefit ratio is
something that has to be taken into consideration. This considers the possible risks associated
with activity compared to any potential benefits. The DNP ensures that the potential danger is
not out of proportion to the potential rewards (Mbachu, 2020). The risk-benefit analysis is
carried out to establish the connection between the two.
Any potentially beneficial medical study will inevitably come with associated danger. In
order to achieve the desired effect of having a beneficial impact on patient outcomes, it is the
responsibility of the DNP to think about ethical considerations before beginning the study.
During the DNP project's analysis, the DNP must keep an eye on the risk-to-benefit ratio. The
potential for a rise in costs or the number of different ways to quantify a change are examples of
potential hazards associated with this project (Oeser & Romano, 2021). Even if it would be
beneficial to have improved patient outcomes, if the threats were more than the benefits, then the

evidence could not be robust. Because research is ongoing, the ratio of risks to benefits is
constantly evolving. To ensure that the potential advantages continue to outweigh the potential
drawbacks, staying abreast of the most current studies is essential.

References

Burgess, D. J., Beach, M. C., & Saha, S. (2017). Mindfulness practice: A promising approach to
reducing the effects of clinician implicit bias on patients. Patient education and
counseling, 100(2), 372-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.005
Oeser, G., & Romano, P. (2021). Exploring risk pooling in hospitals to reduce demand and lead
time uncertainty. Operations Management Research, 14(1), 78-94.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-020-00171-y
Saville, C. E., Griffiths, P., Ball, J. E., & Monks, T. (2019). How many nurses do we need? A
review and discussion of operational research techniques applied to nurse
staffing. International journal of nursing studies, 97, 7-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.015

The post Response to Martha appeared first on My perfect tutors.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Essay Writing Service